🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Cult can be characterized by clear stages.

1. The Core Concept

A dominant personality or coaches present a new and transcendent idea that promises a solution for alienated and vulnerable people.

And so it goes. They’re getting ready to confront the system down in Brisbane. The gunships are circling. Signs of trouble appear from within. A lone figure, exposed, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT smeared across his chest in chicken blood, has come staggering into view and is taken aside under a blanket to a different team in county cricket.

Do you ever miss the start, when the world was still young? The days of Bazball 1.0, of uninhibited aggression.

2. Initial Adoration

Team architects guarantee a reboot, a brighter tomorrow, camaraderie, success within a community united in belief in the method.

What was this thing initially? A team united basking in glory. Tattoos. Strength. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, England’s players insist it’s not a real term, ironically since it’s not recognized, what did we see?

But we know what it is. It’s the player playing a shot so unconventional it’s beyond belief. It’s the adrenaline of Ben Stokes in ultimate mode, a demeanor suggesting: pensive Nordic god, strong features, untamed style, so authentically Modern Savage you almost imagine to look down and see him playing in the field shirtless embracing nature.

It’s Ben Duckett often seen addressing the media, appearing as a joyful figure formally attired, expressing thoughts like we’re breaking down traditions. Indeed, the vibe, for quite a long time, was entirely positive.

3. The Growth Phase

Development stage. Cohesion maintained by rote learning of the cult’s slogans. These ideas can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”.

Does anyone else feel? The criticism, the anger, the feeling of letdown post-defeat feels overblown, too much. England batted badly during the match, as they often do in Australia. They were torn apart in the field for a couple of hours when tactics failed, carved around by the opponent batting like England but better, adjusting to the pitch, an athlete shining with a kind of light around him.

Now there is the pile-on, the rage, the sense of English Test cricket as a kind of abomination. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they must be humbled, to be cleansed, destroyed, defeated through sheer skill of the bowler’s action, the simple basics of the bowler, marking achievements humbly similar to getting a rewarding prize. What will this do to them?

4. Hate Bonding

Challenges surface due to setbacks. But the cult cannot admit errors. It starts to feed on hostility externally.

The fact remains, half a week out the next match, we’ve entered an intriguing moment in the story of this thing. England could quite easily win overseas in a blur of adrenal disruption. More likely, failure may follow. Should they fail it seems we may see the final stage.

Prior to that, there are two things to consider regarding this. More than two years ago, during the initial excitement, of passion and hope, a column appeared suggesting Bazball was a cult. People were very angry, which was helpful since it’s clear the best way of proving that it’s not a closed group is when its acolytes react defensively denying scrutiny of its truths.

The developments in the last few days are fascinating. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. Online outrage is widespread, disappointed commentators, shots of angry middle-aged travelling fans missing out on play, like a room full of people wanting fairness.

Conversely, there is the broader context of the opponent’s mixed ingrained annoyance towards the unconventional visitors, claiming, hey, that thing you love and have developed as part of your identity from others, it’s not serious in the end old boy.

This is the core issue. All movements are similar. The style was a trend as the game has its own culture. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a circle, a garden party, a restricted environment with centuries of opaque and ritualistic cult history defining it. It has long been where influence is guarded. It’s the British pastime of the British, the early image-makers. And surprisingly, the nation has its own culture, a system of unknown levels, a place that literally still has a king.

The team have been isolated in this system since childhood. Attempting to break free, to build a better atmosphere, they are mirroring their own experience, building another enclosure, a closed circle, but now with a new team and a leader who wants you to be yourself provided you conform.

Focus on the moment. Embrace challenges. However much you change, things stay similar.

Considering this, it might be appropriate to offer compassion for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, of which there are many. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with